Growth Stocks Are Getting Crushed - Here's What You Need to Know
Summary
Daniel observes a significant 'weirdness' in the market where the S&P 500 remains at all-time highs while many individual stocks are in deep corrections. He attributes this to a 99th percentile dispersion event, the likes of which haven't been seen since the dot-com bubble. Investors are rotating out of software and growth sectors into defensive stocks like Walmart, Costco, and Pepsi. Daniel finds this ironic because these 'safe' stocks are trading at historically high valuations despite low growth, making them arguably riskier than the growth stocks being sold.
The main driver for this shift is a widespread fear of Artificial Intelligence (AI) disrupting software business models. Daniel notes that the market is currently selling anything with even a slight narrative of being at risk, regardless of fundamental strength. He emphasizes that while some legacy software is vulnerable, companies with 'proprietary data' and physical distribution networks have moats that AI cannot easily replicate. He urges investors to be highly selective, auditing each company's vulnerability to being replaced by AI-generated code.
Mentioned Stocks
Reasoning: Meta is successfully leveraging AI to automate ad creation, generating a new $10 billion revenue stream. Daniel believes this strengthens their moat and represents a high ROI on their AI spending.
Reasoning: Daniel is bearish on Adobe due to the rapid advancement of AI video generation tools. He believes these technologies threaten Adobe's core market and has decided not to buy the stock even though it is currently cheaper than his previous entry point.
Reasoning: Daniel argues that Walmart is extremely overvalued with a P/E ratio of 46.6 while only growing earnings and revenue by 5% annually. He considers it a high-risk bet because the market is rotating into it purely based on emotion and safety fears, ignoring the poor valuation.
Reasoning: While Costco has better growth than Walmart (15% vs 5%), its 54.5 P/E ratio is still extremely high. Daniel includes it in the list of defensive stocks that the market is currently overpaying for.
Reasoning: Daniel owns the stock and believes the company will benefit from AI rather than be disrupted by it due to its focus on mission-critical software. However, he is keeping his position at 7% rather than 25% because of general industry uncertainty.
Reasoning: The stock has rallied 20% despite flat revenue growth of 1.7% and declining sales volume since 2022. Daniel views the business as stagnant and the valuation as too high for a company relying solely on price hikes to grow revenue.
Reasoning: The market is selling off SPGI due to AI disruption fears, but Daniel argues its moat is deep due to proprietary data that requires manual collection and standardization, which AI cannot easily replace.