Stock Market History Is About To Be Made (Get Ready)
Summary
Alex presents a critical thesis regarding the SpaceX IPO, characterizing it as a 'trap' for the investing public. He explains that SpaceX has filed for its IPO under a computer programming industry code rather than aerospace to capture the high valuation multiples associated with AI. According to Alex, 93% of the company's total addressable market is now focused on AI, primarily through the acquisition of XAI and its product Grock, which he claims was a move to shift losses from Elon Musk's Twitter acquisition onto SpaceX's balance sheet.
The market outlook provided by Alex is bleak for new SpaceX investors, as he highlights the company's 94-times-revenue valuation, which is significantly higher than established tech giants like Nvidia or Palantir. He expresses concern over the corporate governance structure, noting Musk’s 85% voting control and the lack of legal obligation for the board to bring business opportunities to SpaceX. Furthermore, Alex points out that changes to NASDAQ's listing rules, such as the fast-entry rule and the elimination of the 10% minimum free float, will force index funds to purchase the stock at inflated prices shortly after the IPO, providing liquidity for insiders to sell.
Specific stocks and entities discussed include:
Mentioned Stocks
Reasoning: Alex is avoiding the IPO due to what he describes as an insane valuation of 94 times revenue, a lack of transparency in its AI-focused business model, and massive governance red flags where Elon Musk maintains total control. He mentions the IPO price is expected to be $135 per share, valuing the company at $1.75 trillion, which he believes is a valuation driven by hype rather than the fundamentals of the underlying rocket or Starlink businesses.
Reasoning: Alex is selling his shares in the NASDAQ 100 because the index changed its rules to allow SpaceX to enter quickly despite a low free float. He argues this forces index investors to buy into a volatile and potentially overpriced stock, compromising the integrity of the index as a passive investment tool.
Reasoning: Alex is buying VGT as a replacement for his NASDAQ 100 position, noting its history of outperforming the QQQ, lower fees, and the fact that its underlying index will not include SpaceX, thus avoiding the risks he perceives with that IPO.