I just Spent $73,000 on my Next AMD‼️
Summary
Jeremy provides an analysis of the current tech-driven market, focusing on the divergence between 'winners' like AMD and Google versus 'losers' like Meta. He explains that the market is currently narrative-driven, but emphasizes that high-quality companies with attractive valuations remain the best long-term plays. Jeremy references Steve Eisman’s view that the economy remains 'K-shaped' and that the dominance of tech in the S&P 500 justifies higher market multiples compared to a decade ago.
Jeremy discusses the recent sell-off in SaaS (Software as a Service) stocks, suggesting it may be a result of forced liquidations by overleveraged funds rather than purely a fundamental shift. He mentions that when institutional players are forced to liquidate, price becomes secondary to the need for exits. He also highlights the importance of transparency in corporate reporting, suggesting Meta could fix its stock price by breaking out individual business segments like WhatsApp and Instagram to show specific growth drivers.
Mentioned Stocks
Reasoning: While acknowledging the phenomenal 33% revenue growth, Jeremy notes that the market is punishing the stock because it does not trust the massive capex spend. He mentions that Zuckerberg hasn't effectively explained why the spend is necessary.
Reasoning: Jeremy believes AMD is a long-term buy with a target price between $500 and $1,000. He views the $365-$380 range as a critical breakout level that will force analysts to upgrade their price targets to the $400s.
Reasoning: Jeremy considers Alphabet a 'must-own' winner because its 63% cloud growth provides clear ROI for its capex. He highlights the company's many 'shots on goal' and visibility into AI monetization.
Reasoning: Jeremy agrees with Steve Eisman's negative view, noting that FICO has aggressively raised prices by 500% and is now significantly overpriced compared to alternatives like Vantage Score, which has led to recent stock price destruction.